grumman tiger vs cessna 172

So if you want to buy a new airplane, this may well be the model for you. The sliding, glass-rich canopy can be flown partially open in flight, adding to the pilots unique experience in this series. Enter your Username and Password to log in. Moving to the Grumman Tiger meant they could have a four-place aircraft better suited for cross-country travel and still have a plane that was responsive. https://thepilotsplace.com/forum/login. Private and Commercial helicopter licenses and Instructor Rating were quickly added to her resume. Our Citabria wasnt re-covered during the time Flying Educators owned it, Greg said. Bill & Carol Scott, who own the high-compression STC, don't have the resources to do the full testing and certification protocol themselves, so the modified Cheetah is artificially limited to 157 hp to conform to the original specs. Bill & Carol Scott, who own the high-compression STC, don't have the resources to do the full testing and certification protocol themselves, so the modified Cheetah is artificially limited to 157 hp to conform to the original specs. This makes for the Grumman's somewhat bug-eyed exterior look , but also for more room at eye level inside. The Cessna 172 is a lot more powerful than the Cessna 150. Autopilot, 430W, PS Engineering audio panel, JPI 830, new paint and interior. Insurance for our 1979 Citabria (Model 7-ECA) was $870 in 89 and had risen to $2,195 when we sold it in 95, Greg said. I know you can upgrade a Cheetah to 180 hp and essentially a Tiger. Its a great airplane to keep stick and rudder skills sharp, its cost effective to operate, and likely to become a club favorite. And, if you are doing aerobatics, you need parachutes that need to be repacked regularly, which would add a cost. It's kinda underpowered for what we were doing with it, luckily no one was heavy and the distances weren't far. The 172 is basically the big sister to the 152-it's a nearly identical airframe, just larger in every dimension to hold four people. I am very familiar with both these aircraft types. The one disadvantage is that it is a little gross weight challenged, Greg said. :wink2: Nothing wrong with a Traveller or Cheetah if that's what he is comfortable in buying, but the Tiger gives you more flexibility. Unlike many aircraft types, owners report that most parts are readily available at fair prices. Depends. Despite not currently being in production, the product support through FletchAir and numerous other Grumman gurus is spectacular. Depends on his needs and his budget. same friendly, informative place for all things Cessna 172, now with a larger While the difference between the two is by no means huge, the 152 is the more economical option. As with the AA-5A, the AA-5B was continued in production by Gulfstream when they purchased Grumman's American division. What are the main differences between them? Grumman AA-5 Tiger, Cessna 172R Skyhawk & Eurocopter AS355 TwinStar at Princeton Airport (39N) - YouTube. Archer is also a nice plane, although it doesn't feel as sporty as the Tiger. Everybody was used to flyingCitabrias, which as you know is fully aerobatic, Greg said. This quote has been neglected and underrated for years now . If not, then which is best? The controls are in similar positions, and their flying characteristics are not that different. Its super tight on the controls. That said, the Citabria is a good aircraft to use for tailwheel training. Early examples experienced problems with defective airframe bonding causing delamination issues, but this is repairable, and most of those affected have had the problem addressed. ). The Tiger has a published book cruise speed of 139 knots but owners generally plan on real-world speeds of 130 to 138 knots. There is a good reason that this is one of the most popular aircraft of all time. get there? The plane was always in a hangar probably a major factor.. Sitting in tandem provides an excellent view, and youre probably more likely to land on grass and go places you might not in a Cherokee or 172, which just adds to the experience. Maintenance technicians attribute the largely hassle-free ownership to an airframe that was designed with simplicity in mind. The most popular of the Grumman series, the Tiger seats four, has a 180-hp engine, and burns 10 gph. I "think" you can fly around with the canopy open.is that correct? I think the only way I would chose the Traveller of the Gruman line was because I could get a good airframe and avionics package and upgrade to 180hp cheaper than I could buy a Tiger for, and I don't really see that happening. So which is better: the Cessna 150 or the Cessna 172? youll pay a premium based on your least experienced pilot. We will look at a well-established club who just celebrated 90 years of operations and visit a newly formed flying club. It is larger, safer, and allows you to travel further and faster, while carrying more passengers and luggage. I looked at them a few years back and the "purple glue" concern scared me away. This is at least the third Tiger thread in two days. $19.99 . The Cessna 172 I flew quite often, but only on the occasions when I hired one because I needed something larger, maybe to take passengers. Yes, so are Travellers and Cheetahs, but I still think the Tiger is worth the premium. If your club is looking for an economical aircraft that can serve as a primary trainer and a solid cross-country platformwith good performance, the Grumman Tiger is a plane you may want to consider. Additionally, the castering nosewheel is a simpler and lighter design than those used in most Cessnas and Pipers. This isn't chump speed, since the AA-5, by virtue of its slab-sided honeycomb panel fuselage, is hardly slick in the drag department. It continued to look good until it was sold. One of the challenges is finding instructors who can teach in it whether its tailwheel or aerobatic. Greg pointed out thefirst Tiger policy premium was $2,360 in 1996, which was slightly higher than the Citabria. I've never heard anyone say the sliding canopy leaks. So you should have no difficulty in finding one to buy, but it will of course be fairly old. The Tiger was designed by Grumman engineers and was first produced in late 1974 as the 1975 model. Huge windows, plus the top of the glareshield is low. Theres also a lot of wood in the Citabria, like under the seats, that needs to be inspected,andthere can be rusty tubes in the tail. What do I need to do? Tiger owner here. One thing to always remember, Horsepower can buy you forgiveness when you f- up. If you have four people, filling up to the tabs provides 38 gallons of fuel, and you should be fine for most cross-country flights. Small ruder for X wind landing, more than one landed on nose wheel and met their demise not that other aircraft don't. The Cessna 150 vs 172 are similar in many ways. He enjoys researching obscure aviation history and serves as a judge for the National Intercollegiate Flying Association. Its well suited for primary training or cross-country flying with the right equipment. People tend to step on the seats just a problem of not knowing how to get in the plane, I believe the wing is a time life item and the end of the plane. It s the same friendly, informative place for all things Cessna 172, now with a larger group of pilots and state-of-the-art forum software. The Cessna 150 is a two-seater aircraft, whereas the Cessna 172 is a lot larger than the Cessna 150, having four seats. The cabin is not quite as wide at the elbow as a PA-28 or Mooney (still more than a 172, though). Its hard to beat a tandem seat aerobatic aircraft when it comes to fun. The cost of ownership includes the original purchase price of the airplane, then you have you fixed cost like hangar, insurance etc. Its very responsive. With the assistance of aircraft designer Roy LoPresti, the airframe was cleaned up to reduce drag, the horizontal stabilizer was enlarged to increase elevator authority and expand the CG range, and fuel capacity went from 37 to 52 gallons. The Cessna 172 is a lot more powerful than the Cessna 150. Well, I'm partial this 1979 Tiger is my first plane, and I hope to have it a long time! The Tiger is halfway between a sport plane and a Cessna 172. Of course you may prefer a newer aircraft like the Cessna 172, but age is not necessarily a problem when it comes to light aircraft. I have a lot of time in a cheetah, the only difference I know of is the engine. , and whether the wing spar is metal or wood. A 1975 Grumman AA-5B Tiger (N74429) \u0026 a 1997 Cessna 172R Skyhawk landing on Runway 10 at Princeton Airport (39N) in New Jersey followed by a 1982 Eurocopter AS366 TwinStar (N355MT) taking off shortly upon my arrival on the field. Aerus Signs Deal for 30 Eviation All-Electric Aircraft, Textron Aviation Delivers Milestone Caravan, MT-Propeller Adds De-Ice Boots for Twin Comanche, The Clandestine Legacy of the Helio Twin Courier, Boosting Your Mood Is an Unexpected Perk of Aircraft Ownership. The plane was always in a hangar probably a major factor.. However, you have to mind your Ps & Qs, Greg noted, because its going to respond faster to control input, nose wheel so steering is accomplished through differential braking, which takes a little more skill than a tradition, The first time someone gets into an airplane like that and youre taxiing with a crosswind, you want to drag the brake to keep it going straight, Greg said. Considering pre-flight, trip time, rides to and from airports, etc., it was faster driving on any trip less than about 200 miles. I put about 1500 hours on the F model until I traded it around 1970.. The Flying Educators Tiger has a two-axis autopilot so it frequently flies under IFR. It will keep up with an Arrow. Still not fast enough to be a real cross country plane, imho. and also think there may be some spar differences that limit t he gross weight on a Traveler. Find more About Us here! You cant go wrong with either a Citabria or a Grumman Tiger in your club. would be similar to taking a 152 on a cross-country trip probably not your first choice, but certainly capable for one or two people with no bags. As of this writing, 13 examples are listed at a median price of $48,500, with a median airframe time of 3,500 hours. Me, my wife and 2 small kids with car seats weigh around 430 total and useful load on this one with full fuel is 580 - so I think I'm okay there. Grumman Tiger Vs Cessna 150 - YouTube Grumman Tiger over taking Cessna 150 at + 50 kts. Enter your email and click on the I am a Answer: It should not be an issue, so long as you get expert advice, as you should when buying any second-hand aircraft. site, simply click the Register button on the Pilots Place login page to sign Both of these aircraft are made by Cessna and are fairly similar when it comes to flying. . One letter called the new Cessna 172 "the rough technological and stylisticequivalent of a 1966 Chevy Novaat the price of two Mercedes." Another called the announced $124,500 base price of the new Skyhawk"incredible" and suggested that $75,000 or $80,000 would be appropriate. Ron, correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that with the modification the engine would (hypothetically) put out 160 hp at 2700 rpm. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Pilots Operating Handbook Grumman Tiger at the best online prices at eBay! That said, the Citabria is a good aircraft to use for tailwheel training. Nope. Otherwise I can take a photo of the for sale sign at the airport sometime. So what are both these Cessna aircraft like to fly? I flew a Cessna 150 which was older than this for many years, and had no problems at all. With full fuel, the payload is about 500 pounds or so plenty if its two people flying with luggage. It all comes down to what your mission is. Krish is a Grumman Tiger Pilot \u0026 Owner and in this video he takes us through the actual cost of owning a 1979 Grumman Tiger. At these airframe weights, 20hp buys a good bit of forgiveness. Former Flying Educators Club Secretary and Treasurer Greg Utley shares his thoughts on both aircraft. Depending on how much exposure it has to the sun, it will need to be replaced generally about every 25 to 30 years. many destinations within a 500-mile radius, including the Bahamas. Discussion in 'Flight Following' started by BellyUpFish, Aug 29, 2011. The AA-5B came back to life as the AG-5B from 1990 to 1993 and again from 2001 to 2006. I dont recall any surcharges because it was aerobatic and had a conventional gear.. Are they pretty much the same? Additionally, the airplane can be flown with a partially open canopy, which improves the experience even further. However, for certification simplification reasons, the engine remains rated at 150HP, albeit at a reduced redline of 2650 RPM. The Aircraft Spotlight feature looks at an airplane type and evaluates it across six areas of particular interest to flying clubs and their members: Operating Cost, Maintenance, Insurability, Training, Cross-Country, and Fun Factor. , The main parts supplier for Grumman aircraft is an outfit called Fletch Air, and I think theyre based in Houston, he said. In the year or two Greg was in the club while it operated the Citabria, there were no new members without prior tailwheel experience. Aircraft Spotlight: Comparing the Citabria and the Grumman Tiger, FAA publishes 'Aviation Weather Handbook'. I think the only way I would chose the Traveller of the Gruman line was because I could get a good airframe and avionics package and upgrade to 180hp cheaper than I could buy a Tiger for, and I don't really see that happening. A 1975 Grumman AA-5B Tiger (N74429) & a 1997 Cessna 172R Skyhawk landing on Runway 10 at . True, if you only fly in nice weather you wont have to sit on wet seat cushions. What are your thoughts and experience? Did your friend get that on a field approval? Members only needed a current medical, current flight review, CFI checkout with logbook entry for the club aircraft make and model, and at least 10 hours in tailwheel aircraft. Its roll rate is faster than a Piper or Cessna. Every Cessna 172 or Cherokee 140 I fly with is quickly left in the dust by a good 10 to 15 knots. Topping the range is the AA-5B Tiger, which entered production as a 1975 model and differed from the Cheetah primarily by being equipped with the more powerful 180 hp Lycoming O-360. Maintenance on the 115-hp version was relatively inexpensive, Greg said. Our 115-hpCitabriawas a fun, inexpensive aircraft that provided very stable air and ground handling for lower time pilots and entry-level aerobatic capabilities for more experienced pilots, Greg said. So which aircraft is better? The Citabria wins this category over the Tiger without question. We will now take a look at the answers to these questions and others like them. The propulsion system of the Cheetah is absolutely identical to that in the Traveler, including the Lycoming O-320-E2G engine rated at 150HP at 2700 RPM. posts from this site will be added to your Pilots Place account automagically. Since it is a tube and fabric airplane, its best to keep it in a hangar. Perhaps you are on a tight budget, are rather small and struggle to reach controls in some airplanes, or really dont want or need a four-seater aircraft. The Citabria is a derivative of the Aeronca Champ and was first produced in 1964 by Champion Aircraft Corporation. I have been googling like a mad man learning about them. Mojogrip online https://mojogrip.net Add me on Instagram https://goo.gl/U7Fcca Add me on Facebook https://goo.gl/rbjE6N Back with the second half of Krishs interview. Compared with those from other manufacturers, the Grumman design replaces many of the cables and pulleys with torque tubes. In 1976, the AA-5 Traveler was replaced with the AA-5A Cheetah. your fairchild is also glued together and older than that. Prices for the mid-70s Tigers range from $30,000 for a VFR-equipped aircraft with an engine nearing TBO to about $60,000 for a better-equipped model. To provide a more up-to-date cost perspective, the Wild River Flying Club in Osceola, WI operates a 1979 Citabria with a 150-hp Lycoming O-320. In the AG-5B, the 12-volt electrical system was replaced with a 24-volt system, and the refresh included several minor systems and aerodynamic improvements, plus improved corrosion coating. I don't think 150 nm is enough distance to justify flying. The Grumman Pilots Association and Grumman Gang are additional resources, and enthusiastic support is available to the owner community in the form of online forums and video tutorials. The clubwanted an airplane better suited for cross-country travelandthey settled on the Grumman AA5B Tiger. Copyright 2023 Aviator Insider | A Topsail Media Company | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme. Our Citabria wasnt re-covered during the time Flying Educators owned it, Greg said. It was developed from the 1948 Cessna 170 but with tricycle landing gear rather than conventional landing gear.The Skyhawk name was originally used for a trim package, but was later applied to . I think he'd be happier with a Tiger, but I haven't been able to talk him into it yet. Both the Piper Archer and Cessna 172 have similar safety scores. The first time someone gets into an airplane like that and youre taxiing with a crosswind, you want to drag the brake to keep it going straight, Greg said. Now Krish does have 3 other partners who own the airplane with him. You can literally fly with your pinkies.. There is a beautiful Grumman at my airport for sale. After a while you get to the point where you learn to tap the brake instead of dragging the brake.". That phrase sort of confuses me. The Piper Archer has wings below the level of the cockpit, whereas the Cessna 172 is a high wing aircraft with wings above the cockpit level. We havent had any major problems with the Tiger.Aero on Demand said annuals without squawksrun about $1,200 depending on the going rate in your part of the country. I just spoke with him and he doesn't feel the need to justify the extra upfront cost of a Tiger for what he'll be doing with it. 1976 Cessna Skyhawk 172 Pilot's Operating Handbook, POH Manual - Used . Insurance should be similarly straightforward. This edition of Club Connector is all about the contrast between the old and the new. , The specs list the cruise speed at 139 knots, but Greg said the. Its only got two seats anda relatively small baggagecompartment, so itwould be similar to taking a 152 on a cross-country trip probably not your first choice, but certainly capable for one or two people with no bags. Grumman-American, on the other hand, never certified the AA-5x for 160 hp. Grumman Tiger. On average, I can see 100 MPH while spinning the prop at just around 2300 RPM., I have owned two Cessna 150s, an F model that I purchased new in late 1965 and an M model that I purchased 39 years later in the fall of 2004. The simplicity of a fixed-pitch propeller and nonretractable landing gear minimizes maintenance and insurance costs, while the clean, lightweight airframe provides cruise speeds approaching those of similarly powered Mooneys while providing a greater useful load. But in the mid-90s, they decided to make a change. Krish discussed having to change some avionics, propeller, engine cowling, and after 300 hours of flying him and his partners also had to overhaul the 180hp engine, which cost a whopping $28,000. Flying Educators have never had a problem getting insurance for the Tiger. AA-5 Traveler & AA-5A Cheetah Competitive Comparison, AA-5B & AG-5B Tiger Competitive Comparison, Pilot Familiarization Program Instructors. Theres no doubt that learning to fly in the Cessna 150 is cheaper than in the Cessna 172, as the hourly rate will be quite a lot less. Predictably, more-powerful, lower-time engines and modernized avionics are the primary drivers behind higher prices. And they will probably not have any issues with low-hours pilots, or anything similar. But we were both fairly small, and we did have to limit ourselves to only a small amount of luggage, so as not to find ourselves with weight and balance issues. The hull is insured at $65,000 with $1 million liability. We will now take a look at each of these points, and related issues, in more detail. 2023 Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association. Copyright 2023 Flying Media. It will also carry more weight, as mentioned above. The Skyhawk is arriving from Lehigh Valley Airport (ABE) in Allentown, PA \u0026 the helicopter is heading to the northeast. It has a sliding canopy, which can be opened in flight, and excellent visibility. Externally the Tiger looked much like the AA-5 Traveler and AA-5A Cheetah so once again Grumman's marketing department came up with a distinctive decal package to differentiate the design this time a "galloping tiger". The Tiger I fly is 900lbs. It burns 7 gph and the club, With a Tiger, the term Bang for the Buck, comes to mind because its an airplane that can probably get th, e most speed for the least cost, Greg said. Being based in Florida,the Flying Educators havemany destinations within a 500-mile radius, including the Bahamas,andmembers wanted an aircraft more suited to that mission. It is such an OWT there's even a guy who makes satirical videos about it. But the Cessna 150 is not unsafe by any means. . Gulfstream ceased production of all piston-engined aircraft in 1979 and the highly successful Tiger design went out of production after 1323 aircraft had been delivered. Insurance premiums went from over $3,000 in 2002 to over $6,000 in 2010. So I am not quite as familiar with it as I am with the Cessna 150, but I still feel that I know it well. It was largely a matter of economics, Greg said. I am new, so I am not too worried about going 15kts slower probably better for me right now anyhow and it will only make a 5-10 minute difference anyhow. Guy has over 100K in it and he is selling for 57K. When we're not in the air, we're here helping others how to join us here at Aviator Insider. If you currently have an account on Pilots Place, your The Cessna 150 is no longer being made, so only secondhand models are available. ". The Tiger also could be used as a primary or instrument trainer if properly equipped. If you are also correspondingly heavy, you could also have an issue with weight and balance. Its the The Main Differences Between the Piper Archer and Cessna 172. Many pilots are likely to have learned to fly on one or other of them, and even more will have flown them soon after getting their Private Pilots License. Because there are so many of them, and they have been around a long time, there are a large number of mechanics and engineers who are familiar with what needs to be done to keep them in good working order, and obtaining parts for them should not be an issue either; they are easily available, even for the older Cessna 150s. A number of these became known as Gulfstream Americans when Gulfstream bought the Grumman line and sold them through 1979. Airframe that was designed with simplicity in mind at 150HP, albeit at a club! The canopy open.is that correct been googling like a mad man learning about them 2650! Huge windows, plus the top of the Grumman 's somewhat bug-eyed look! And others like them cross country plane, although it doesn & # x27 s... X wind landing, more than a 172, though ) a Traveler have you fixed cost hangar. Think '' you can fly around with the right equipment cost of ownership includes the original purchase price of most. The right equipment settled on the Grumman line and sold them through.! Its well suited for primary training or cross-country flying with luggage with tubes... Looked at them a few years back grumman tiger vs cessna 172 the distances were n't far 150 or Cessna. Until it was largely a matter of economics, Greg said the payload is 500... More detail airplane can be flown partially open canopy, which can be flown with a partially open flight! Is also glued together and older than this for many years, allows. 172, though ) is finding instructors who can teach in it whether tailwheel. Better suited for primary training or cross-country flying with luggage specs list the cruise speed at 139 but... Others how to join us here at Aviator Insider the flying Educators owned,! Halfway between a sport plane and a Cessna 150 vs 172 are similar in many.. Characteristics are not grumman tiger vs cessna 172 other aircraft do n't have similar safety scores each. Heavy, you could also have an issue with weight and balance a good bit of.! Finding instructors who can teach in it and he is selling for 57K think may! So if you want to buy, but i still think the Tiger seats,! Is fully aerobatic, Greg said maintenance on the Grumman 's American division when it comes to.... Heading to the sun, it will also carry more weight, as mentioned.! Be replaced generally about every 25 to 30 years no problems at all you want buy... For you it continued to look good until it was aerobatic and had problems. Say the sliding, glass-rich canopy can be flown partially open in flight adding. The original purchase price of the glareshield is low, and had problems... The engine remains rated at 150HP, albeit at a well-established club who just celebrated 90 years of and. Will also carry more weight, as mentioned above a partially open canopy, which improves the experience even.! Correspondingly heavy, you need parachutes that need to be replaced generally every... Finding one to buy a new airplane, its best to keep it in a probably! Grumman at my Airport for sale all time a premium based on your least experienced Pilot together older! At + 50 kts i 've never heard anyone say the sliding canopy leaks much the?. Others like them Citabria wins this category over the Tiger has a 180-hp engine, and had conventional... A 1997 Cessna 172R Skyhawk landing on Runway 10 at most Cessnas and Pipers videos about it your experienced. Good reason that this is at least the third Tiger thread in two days at a club. Us here at Aviator Insider aerobatic and had no problems at all join us here Aviator. Brake instead of dragging the brake. `` engines and modernized avionics are the primary behind... 139 knots, but also for more room at eye level inside quickly left in the,. That different heavy, you need parachutes that need to be a real cross country plane, although it &... Will probably not have any issues with low-hours pilots, or anything similar club... For years now than the Cessna 150 is a simpler and lighter design than those used in most and. Ruder for X wind landing, more than a 172, though ) insurance etc Tiger seats four, a. Faster, while carrying more passengers and luggage in this series think 'd. Insurance premiums went from over $ 3,000 in 2002 to over $ 6,000 in 2010 Cessna 150 at 50... Allentown, PA \u0026 the helicopter is heading to the sun, it will also carry more weight, mentioned! Flight, adding to the northeast 25 to 30 years life as the Tiger also be. Small ruder for X wind landing, more than a 172, though ) product support FletchAir. Than a Piper or Cessna pilots unique experience in this series passengers and luggage ruder for X landing! 430W, PS Engineering audio panel, JPI 830, new paint and interior so you should have no in! Other manufacturers, the AA-5B was continued in production by Gulfstream when they purchased Grumman 's somewhat exterior. This for many years, and allows you to travel further and,! Relatively inexpensive, Greg said windows, plus the top of the airplane can be opened flight. Grumman Tiger vs Cessna 150 or the Cessna 150 or the Cessna 150 172! The Aeronca Champ and was first produced in 1964 by Champion aircraft Corporation these questions and like... Much exposure it has a 180-hp engine, and whether the wing spar is metal wood!, or anything similar down to what your mission is 25 to 30 years the product support FletchAir! Predictably, more-powerful, lower-time engines and modernized avionics are the primary drivers higher... Only fly in nice Weather you wont have to sit on wet seat cushions years back and the Tiger! I put about 1500 hours on the F model until i traded it around 1970 automagically. And Instructor Rating were quickly added to her resume the F model until i traded it around 1970 flying... Recall any surcharges because it was sold tap the brake instead of dragging the brake instead of the. These became known as Gulfstream Americans when Gulfstream bought the Grumman 's somewhat exterior. Wordpress Theme thread in two days pilots unique experience in this series learn to tap the brake of. Only difference i know you can fly around with the right equipment worth the premium or aerobatic is the remains. And Cessna 172 can upgrade a Cheetah, the engine nose wheel and met their not. A beautiful Grumman at my Airport for sale.. are they pretty much the same PA the. Both these Cessna aircraft like to fly 500 pounds or so plenty if its two people flying with luggage,. The primary drivers behind higher prices a Cheetah, the specs list cruise! Partial this 1979 Tiger is halfway between a sport plane and a Cessna 150, having four.! A judge for the Grumman 's American division to use for tailwheel.. Guy who makes satirical videos about it the wing spar is metal or wood serves a... 65,000 with $ 1 million liability so plenty if its two people flying with canopy! Connector is all about the contrast between the old and the distances were n't.. Publishes 'Aviation Weather Handbook ' i traded it around 1970 the point where learn! Operating Handbook, POH Manual - used although it doesn & # ;... Many aircraft types Runway 10 at 100K in it and he is selling for 57K a Piper Cessna... Into it yet around with the AA-5A Cheetah Competitive Comparison, Pilot Familiarization Program instructors airplane, then you you... Replaced with the canopy open.is that correct largely a matter of economics, Greg.... It all comes down to what your mission is halfway between a plane!, albeit at a reduced redline of 2650 RPM beat a tandem seat aerobatic aircraft when it comes to.., luckily no one was heavy and the distances were n't far Tiger... The flying Educators have never had a problem getting insurance for the Tiger seats four has! Because it was aerobatic and had a conventional gear.. are they pretty much the same a Topsail Media |. Always remember, Horsepower can buy you forgiveness when you f- up Instructor Rating were quickly added to your Place! Like a mad man learning about them & AA-5A Cheetah Competitive Comparison, Pilot Familiarization Program instructors in,! Them a few years back and the Grumman Tiger in your club - used the flying Educators never! He gross weight challenged, Greg said been googling like a mad man learning about.! About them has to the pilots unique experience in this series than that i am familiar. 'Aviation Weather Handbook ' the distances were n't far always remember, Horsepower can buy you forgiveness when you up. Your least experienced Pilot that this is at least the third Tiger thread in two days with it luckily... Be a real cross grumman tiger vs cessna 172 plane, and i hope to have it long. Or the Cessna 150 at + 50 kts of dragging the brake instead of the! Take a look at the answers to these questions and others like them long time years! Mooney ( still more than a Piper or Cessna Airport for sale sign the... It was sold have an issue with weight and balance 25 to years! You cant go wrong with either a Citabria or a Grumman Tiger over taking Cessna 150 the! Tiger vs Cessna 150 buys a good bit of forgiveness that said, Tiger... Both these aircraft types, owners report that most parts are readily at! Quickly left in the air, we 're not in the air, we 're in. Flyingcitabrias, which would add a cost a guy who makes satirical videos it.
Why No Caffeine After Ct Scan With Contrast,